Engineering Transactions, 62, 4, pp. 403–421, 2014

Finite Element Modelling of Atomic Force Microscope Cantilever Beams with Uncertainty in Material and Dimensional Parameters

Brunel University London
United Kingdom

Xiao WU
Southwest Jiaotong University

Tat-Hean GAN
Brunel University
United Kingdom

National Engineering School of Metz, Laboratory of Mechanics

The stiffness and the natural frequencies of a rectangular and a V-shaped micro-cantilever beams used in Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) were analysed using the Finite Element (FE) method. A determinate analysis in the material and dimensional parameters was first carried out to compare with published analytical and experimental results. Uncertainties in the beams’ parameters such as the material properties and dimensions due to the fabrication process were then modelled using a statistic FE analysis. It is found that for the rectangular micro-beam, a ±5% change in the value of the parameters could result in 3 to 8-folds (up to more than 45%) errors in the stiffness or the 1st natural frequency of the cantilever. Such big uncertainties need to be considered in the design and calibration of AFM to ensure the measurement accuracy at the micron and nano scales. In addition, a sensitivity analysis was carried out for the influence of the studied parameters. The finding provides useful guidelines on the design of micro-cantilevers used in the AFM technology.
Keywords: atomic force microscope; cantilever; stiffness; natural frequency; sensitivity analysis.
Full Text: PDF
Copyright © Polish Academy of Sciences & Institute of Fundamental Technological Research (IPPT PAN).


G Binnig, C F Quate and C Gerber, Atomic force microscope. Physical Review Letter, 1986; 56 (9):930–933.

CB Prater, HJ Butt and PK Hansma, Atomic force microscopy. Nature, 1990; 345(6): 839-840.

J Nader and L Karthik, A review of atomic force microscopy imaging systems: application to molecular metrology and biological sciences. Mechatronics, 2004; 14(8):907-945.

M Tortonese, Cantilevers and tips for atomic force microscopy. Park Scientific Instruments, 1997; 16(2):28-33.

TJ Senden and WA Ducker, Experimental determination of stiffnesss in atomic force microscopy. Langmuir, 1994; 10(4): 1003-1004.

CT Gibson, GS Watson and S Myhra. Determination of the stiffnesss of probes for force microscopy/spectroscopy. Nanotechnology, 1996; 7(9): 259-262.

JP Cleveland, S Manne, D Bocek and PK Hansma, A nondestructive method for determining the stiffness of cantilevers for scanning force microscopy, Review of Science Instruments, 1993; 64(2):403-405.

CT Gibson, Private communication, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leeds.

JE Sader, I Larson, P Mulvaney and LR White, Method for the calibration of atomic force microscope cantilevers, Review of Science Instruments, 1995; 66(7):3789-3798.

CT Gibson, DA Smith and CJ Roberts, Calibration of silicon atomic force microscope cantilevers, Nanotechnology, 2005; 16(2):234-238.

TR Albrecht, S Akamine, TE Carver, and CF Quate. Microfabrication of cantilever styli for the atomic force microscope, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A, 1990; 8(4):3386-3396.

HJ Butt et al, Scan speed limit in atomic force microscopy, Journal of Microscopy, 1993; 169(1):75-84.

CA Clifford and MP Seah, The determination of atomic force microscope cantilever stiffnesss via dimensional methods for nanomechanical analysis. Nanotechnology, 2005; 16 (9):1666-1880.

JE Sader, Parallel beam approximation for V-shaped atomic force microscope cantilevers. Review of Science Instruments, 1995; 66 (9):4583-4587.

RD Cook. Finite Element Modelling for Stress Analysis. John Wiley & Sons Inc Press, 1995, ISBN 0-471-10774-3.

Olympus Optical Corporation, Tokyo, Japan

VJ Morris, AR Kirby and AP Gunning, Atomic Force Microscopy for Biologists, Imperial College Press, 1999, ISBN 1-86094-199-0.

GY Chen, RJ Warmack, TThundat and DP Allison, and A Huang, Resonance response of scanning force microscope cantilevers. Review of Scientific Instruments, 1994; 65 (8):2532-2537.

MF Ashby, Materials selection in mechanical design, Cambridge University Press, 2005, ISBN 0-7506-4357-9.

M Barbato and JP Conte, Finite element response sensitivity analysis: a comparison between force-based and displacement-based frame element models, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2005; 194(8):1479-1512.

S Wang, Y Sun and RH Gallagher, Sensitivity analysis in shape optimization of contimuum structures, Computer & Structures, 1985; 20(5):855-867.

JE Mottershead, M Link and MI Friswell, The sensitivity method in finite element model updating: A tutorial. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2011; 25(10): 2275–2296.

GD Pollock and AK Noor, Sensitivity analysis of the contact/impact response of composite structures, Computers & Structures, 1996; 61(10):251-269.

JM Pajot and K Maute, Analytical sensitivity analysis of geometrically nonlinear structures based on the co-rotational finite element method, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 2006; 42(6):900-913.

KL Reed, KA Rose and RC Whitmore, Latin hypercube analysis of parameter sensitivity in a large model of outdoor recreation demand. Ecological Modelling, 1984; 24(9):159-169.

A Olsson, G Sandberg and O Dahlblom, On Latin hypercube sampling for structural reliability analysis, Structural Safety, 2003; 25(1):47-68.

W Liu, Design of Experiments, Tsinghua University Press, 2011.

DOI: 10.24423/engtrans.265.2014